﻿{"id":1704,"date":"2017-09-09T13:38:19","date_gmt":"2017-09-09T12:38:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.testanonpertinente.net\/locule\/?p=1704"},"modified":"2021-02-17T20:54:17","modified_gmt":"2021-02-17T19:54:17","slug":"1704","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/?p=1704","title":{"rendered":"abstraction, aphairesis (Libera, L\u2019art des g\u00e9n\u00e9ralit\u00e9s. Th\u00e9ories de l\u2019abstraction)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Berkeley se recon\u00adna\u00eet \u00ab&nbsp;capable d\u2019abs\u00adtraire en un cer\u00adtain sens&nbsp;\u00bb. Il dis\u00adtingue donc deux sortes d\u2019abs\u00adtrac\u00adtion&nbsp;: l\u2019abs\u00adtrac\u00adtion authen\u00adtique et la pseu\u00addo-abs\u00adtrac\u00adtion (celle qui, selon lui, pr\u00e9\u00adside chez Locke \u00e0 la for\u00adma\u00adtion des id\u00e9es g\u00e9n\u00e9\u00adrales abs\u00adtraites). Il y a abs\u00adtrac\u00adtion authen\u00adtique, \u00ab&nbsp;lorsque je consi\u00add\u00e8re cer\u00adtaines par\u00adties ou qua\u00adli\u00adt\u00e9s par\u00adti\u00adcu\u00adli\u00e8res \u00e0 part des autres, si mal\u00adgr\u00e9 leur union en un objet, elles peuvent pour\u00adtant exis\u00adter effec\u00adti\u00adve\u00adment de mani\u00e8re ind\u00e9\u00adpen\u00addante&nbsp;\u00bb. Il y a pseu\u00addo-abs\u00adtrac\u00adtion, lorsque je pr\u00e9\u00adtends \u00ab&nbsp;abs\u00adtraire l\u2019une de l\u2019autre ou me repr\u00e9\u00adsen\u00adter s\u00e9pa\u00adr\u00e9\u00adment des qua\u00adli\u00adt\u00e9s qui ne pour\u00adraient exis\u00adter s\u00e9pa\u00adr\u00e9\u00adment les unes des autres&nbsp;\u00bb.<br>\nLe point de d\u00e9part his\u00adto\u00adrial de cette dis\u00adtinc\u00adtion est la th\u00e9o\u00adrie aris\u00adto\u00adt\u00e9\u00adli\u00adco-alexan\u00addri\u00adnienne de l\u2019<i>aphai\u00adre\u00adsis<\/i>, for\u00admu\u00adl\u00e9e pour les uni\u00adver\u00adsaux et les \u00ab&nbsp;abs\u00adtrac\u00adtions&nbsp;\u00bb (ie. les enti\u00adt\u00e9s math\u00e9\u00adma\u00adtiques), d\u00e9fi\u00adnis\u00adsant l\u2019<i>aphai\u00adre\u00adsis<\/i> comme un acte de l\u2019in\u00adtel\u00adlect conce\u00advant s\u00e9pa\u00adr\u00e9\u00adment (de la mati\u00e8re) quelque chose qui par soi n\u2019existe pas \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9\u00adtat s\u00e9pa\u00adr\u00e9 (de la mati\u00e8re). La par\u00adti\u00adcu\u00adla\u00adri\u00adt\u00e9 de la doc\u00adtrine de Berkeley est de r\u00e9duire le domaine de l\u2019abs\u00adtrac\u00adtion \u00e0 cela seul qui peut\/pourrait exis\u00adter s\u00e9pa\u00adr\u00e9\u00adment, de m\u00e9con\u00adna\u00eetre enti\u00e8\u00adre\u00adment la dif\u00adf\u00e9\u00adrence entre \u00ab&nbsp;conce\u00advoir s\u00e9pa\u00adr\u00e9\u00adment&nbsp;\u00bb et \u00ab&nbsp;conce\u00advoir s\u00e9pa\u00adr\u00e9&nbsp;\u00bb et, acces\u00adsoi\u00adre\u00adment (car, apr\u00e8s tout cela, on peut dire que le mal est fait), de reje\u00adter d\u2019a\u00advance toute pos\u00adsi\u00adbi\u00adli\u00adt\u00e9 th\u00e9o\u00adrique d\u2019ex\u00adten\u00adsion aux enti\u00adt\u00e9s phy\u00adsiques du mod\u00e8le g\u00e9o\u00adm\u00e9\u00adtrique de l\u2019abs\u00adtrac\u00adtion d\u00e9fi\u00adni par Alexandre et l\u2019abstractionnisme.<br>\n(\u2026)<br>\nTelle que l\u2019\u00e9\u00adla\u00adbore Berkeley, la dis\u00adtinc\u00adtion entre abs\u00adtrac\u00adtion authen\u00adtique et pseu\u00addo-abs\u00adtrac\u00adtion ne se hisse pas m\u00eame au niveau de la dis\u00adtinc\u00adtion ab\u00e9\u00adlar\u00addienne entre \u00ab&nbsp;conce\u00advoir les choses autre\u00adment qu\u2019elles ne sont&nbsp;\u00bb et \u00ab&nbsp;conce\u00advoir les choses autres qu\u2019elles ne sont&nbsp;\u00bb. Il est clair, pour\u00adtant, qu\u2019une th\u00e9o\u00adrie comme la sienne gagne\u00adrait en pro\u00adfon\u00addeur logique \u00e0 m\u00e9di\u00adter la dif\u00adf\u00e9\u00adrence intro\u00adduite par Ab\u00e9lard entre des ques\u00adtions comme &lt;Q1.1&gt; \u2013 \u00ab&nbsp;Est-ce que toute intel\u00adlec\u00adtion qui a une autre mani\u00e8re de viser que la chose de sub\u00adsis\u00adter, est vaine&nbsp;? \u00bb -, et &lt;Q1 .2&gt; \u2013 \u00ab&nbsp;Est-ce que toute intel\u00adlec\u00adtion visant une chose comme \u00e9tant dis\u00adpo\u00ads\u00e9e autre\u00adment qu\u2019elle est dis\u00adpo\u00ads\u00e9e, est vaine&nbsp;? \u00bb. De m\u00eame, la cri\u00adtique ber\u00adke\u00adleyenne de Locke gagne\u00adrait en effi\u00adca\u00adci\u00adt\u00e9, si, comme le fait Ab\u00e9lard, elle dis\u00adtin\u00adguait entre \u00ab&nbsp;joindre men\u00adta\u00adle\u00adment ce qui est natu\u00adrel\u00adle\u00adment dis\u00adjoint&nbsp;\u00bb et \u00ab&nbsp;croire en l\u2019exis\u00adtence&nbsp;\u00bb de ce qui est ain\u00adsi com\u00adbi\u00adn\u00e9 mentalement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Berkeley se recon\u00adna\u00eet \u00ab&nbsp;capable d\u2019abs\u00adtraire en un cer\u00adtain sens&nbsp;\u00bb. Il dis\u00adtingue donc deux sortes d\u2019abs\u00adtrac\u00adtion&nbsp;: l\u2019abs\u00adtrac\u00adtion authen\u00adtique et la pseu\u00ad\u00addo-abs\u00ad\u00adtrac\u00ad\u00adtion (celle qui, selon lui, pr\u00e9\u00adside chez Locke \u00e0 la for\u00adma\u00adtion des id\u00e9es g\u00e9n\u00e9\u00adrales abs\u00adtraites). Il y a abs\u00adtrac\u00adtion authen\u00adtique, \u00ab&nbsp;lorsque je consi\u00add\u00e8re cer\u00adtaines par\u00adties ou qua\u00adli\u00adt\u00e9s par\u00adti\u00adcu\u00adli\u00e8res \u00e0 part des autres, si mal\u00adgr\u00e9 leur&nbsp;union&nbsp;[\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"quote","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"wp_typography_post_enhancements_disabled":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1723,2005],"class_list":["post-1704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-quote","hentry","category-non-classe","tag-abstraction","tag-aphairesis","post_format-post-format-quote"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1704"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1704\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}