Pour William James, au contraire : il n\u2019est pas<\/i> tou\u00adjours mau\u00advais de croire sur la base d\u2019\u00e9vidences insuf\u00adfi\u00adsantes. Il y a des cas o\u00f9 en sui\u00advant la voie selon laquelle on peut pr\u00e9\u00adf\u00e9\u00adrer l\u2019injonction \u00ab nous devons conna\u00eetre la v\u00e9ri\u00adt\u00e9 \u00bb et non l\u2019autre \u00ab nous devons \u00e9vi\u00adter l\u2019erreur \u00bb, il peut \u00eatre bon (voire ration\u00adnel) de croire des choses qu\u2019on n\u2019a pas de rai\u00adsons bien assu\u00adr\u00e9es de croire et m\u00eame, dans cer\u00adtains cas, il peut \u00eatre bon de croire \u00e0 l\u2019encontre des don\u00adn\u00e9es dont on dis\u00adpose. Il faut dis\u00adtin\u00adguer, d\u2019une part, entre jus\u00adti\u00adfi\u00adca\u00adtion \u00e9pis\u00adt\u00e9\u00admique et jus\u00adti\u00adfi\u00adca\u00adtion \u00e9thique, d\u2019autre part, ce qui peut valoir (et m\u00eame \u00eatre valo\u00adri\u00ads\u00e9) au niveau de l\u2019enqu\u00eate <\/i>de ce qui vaut au niveau de la jus\u00adti\u00adfi\u00adca\u00adtion \u00e9pis\u00adt\u00e9\u00admique. On peut en tirer une double le\u00e7on. Il n\u2019y a pas de paral\u00adl\u00e8le strict entre la sph\u00e8re pra\u00adtique et la sph\u00e8re \u00e9pis\u00adt\u00e9\u00admique ; mais il y a bien rap\u00adport. Sans cela se pro\u00addui\u00adrait une cou\u00adpure entre nos rai\u00adsons<\/i> ou ver\u00adtus cog\u00adni\u00adtives et \u00e9pis\u00adt\u00e9\u00admiques d\u2019un c\u00f4t\u00e9, et nos rai\u00adsons ou ver\u00adtus pra\u00adtiques, de l\u2019autre.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Pour William James, au contraire : il n\u2019est pas tou\u00adjours mau\u00advais de croire sur la base d\u2019\u00e9vidences insuf\u00adfi\u00adsantes. Il y a des cas o\u00f9 en sui\u00advant la voie selon laquelle on peut pr\u00e9\u00adf\u00e9\u00adrer l\u2019injonction \u00ab nous devons conna\u00eetre la v\u00e9ri\u00adt\u00e9 \u00bb et non l\u2019autre \u00ab nous devons \u00e9vi\u00adter l\u2019erreur \u00bb, il peut \u00eatre bon (voire ration\u00adnel) de croire des choses [\u2026]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"quote","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"wp_typography_post_enhancements_disabled":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[965,1116,290,2249,1117,1250,2240,2247,2250],"class_list":["post-2096","post","type-post","status-publish","format-quote","hentry","category-non-classe","tag-connaissance","tag-croyance","tag-dupete","tag-enquete","tag-epistemologie","tag-pragmatisme","tag-tiercelin","tag-vertu-epistemique","tag-william-james","post_format-post-format-quote"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2096","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2096"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2096\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2096"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2096"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testanonpertinente.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2096"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}