15 09 20

Boyer, The Undying

Doing the dishes is not like free­dom. Freedom is wha­te­ver we notice because it isn’t like doing the dishes. The ordi­na­ry is ordi­na­ry because it ordi­na­ri­ly repeats : taking care lacks freedom’s enter­tain­ments and its excep­tions.
For any author of doing the dishes, the best part of the sto­ry would be the sto­ry of mis­sing out on eve­ry­thing else while the dishes are being done. Or a per­son could be a moder­nist of the dishes and make a stream of conscious­ness account of an attempt to flee dish-sink rea­li­ty. But it would be easy for any of those accounts of doing the dishes to miss what is impor­tant about doing the dishes, which is that it is not inter­es­ting or remar­kable work in itself, but that it is the work on which eve­ry­thing else depends.
An ongoing neces­si­ty like dir­ty dishes nee­ding to be done doesn’t pro­duce nar­ra­tive. It pro­duces quan­ti­ties, like how many dishes were washed. It pro­duces tem­po­ral mea­su­re­ments, like how much time was spent washing them and when. Narratives end. Quantities, hours, and dishes don’t. Maybe dishes pro­duce cate­go­ries and dis­tinc­tions.
Maybe one kind of dish is washed but not the other, one kind of tech­nique used and not ano­ther. To stu­dy the dishes could result in an account of spaces, of tech­no­lo­gies, of tools and ins­tru­ments, or infra­struc­tures, eco­no­mics. A work like that could demons­trate the cri­sis that occurs in its absence : the dishes have piled up, the smells and cockroaches have come. Or it could result in an account of class, race, and gender—who, in the cur­rent arran­ge­ment of the world, does the dishes and who does not.
Doing the dishes falls inside a lar­ger set of rela­tions made up of neces­si­ty. We have phy­si­cal bodies. These exist inside and among the lar­ger bodies of the world. All of these bodies—ours and eve­ry­thing else’s—are adhe­red to decay, are always rui­ning or on the verge of it, never evade entro­py or col­lapse. The ordi­na­ry ongoin­gness of our exis­tence, like eve­ry time we do the dishes, is eve­ry time we try to block ruin’s path.
There is the work of making the world, which is the world that’s good to look at, and there is the quie­ter work of kee­ping the world okay once it is here. Making the world is a concrete plea­sure, but the nature of the rest of it has yet to be deter­mi­ned. It’s hard to make a judg­ment of the senses regar­ding the some­times invi­sible and neces­sa­ry efforts we exchange bet­ween us. It is hard to read, for beau­ty, the eve­ryw­here space we are always making around the always mani­fes­ting world of the world.