16 11 19

Dear Robin,

Enclosed you find the first of the publi­ca­tions of White Rabbit Press. The second will be much hand­so­mer.

You are right that I don’t now need your cri­ti­cisms of indi­vi­dual poems. But I still want them. It’s pro­ba­bly from old habit – but it’s an awful­ly old habit. Halfway through After Lorca I dis­co­ve­red that I was wri­ting a book ins­tead of a series of poems and indi­vi­dual cri­ti­cism by anyone sud­den­ly became less impor­tant. This is true of my Admonitions which I will send you when com­plete. (I have eight of them alrea­dy and there will pro­ba­bly be four­teen inclu­ding, of course, this let­ter.)

The trick natu­ral­ly is what Duncan lear­ned years ago and tried to teach us – not to search for the per­fect poem but to let your way of wri­ting of the moment go along its own paths, explore and retreat but never by ful­ly rea­li­zed (confi­ned) within the boun­da­ries of one poem. This is where we were wrong and he was right, but he com­pli­ca­ted things for us by saying that there is no such thing as good or bad poe­try. There is – but not in rela­tion to a single poem. There is real­ly no single poem.

That is why all my stuff from the past (except the Elegies and Troilus) looks foul to me. The poems belong now­here. They are one night stands filled (the best of them) with their own emo­tions, but poin­ting now­here, as mea­nin­gless as sex in a Turkish bath. It was not my anger or my frus­tra­tion that got in the way of my poe­try but the fact that I vie­wed each anger and each frus­tra­tion as unique – some­thing to be conver­ted into poe­try as one would exchange forei­gn money. I lear­ned this from the English Department (and from the English Department of the spi­rit – that great quag­mire that lurks at the bot­tom of all of us) and it rui­ned ten years of my poe­try. Look at those other poems. Admire them if you like. They are beau­ti­ful but dumb.

Poems should echo and ree­cho against each other. They should create reso­nances. They can­not live alone any more than we can.

So don’t send the box of old poe­try to Don Allen. Burn it or rather open it with Don and cry over the pos­sible books that were buried in it – the Songs Against Apollo, the Gallery of Gorgeous Gods, the Drinking Songs – all incom­plete, all abor­tive – all incom­plete, all abor­tive because I thought, like all abor­tio­nists, that what is not per­fect had no real right to live.

Things fit toge­ther. We knew that – it is the prin­ciple of magic. Two incon­se­quen­tial things can com­bine toge­ther to become a conse­quence. This is true of poems too. A poem is nver to be jud­ged by itself alone. A poem is never by itself alone.

This is the most impor­tant let­ter that you have ever recei­ved.

Love,
Jack

« First Letter to Robin Blaser »
Admonitions [1958]
Black Sparrow Press 1975