Yeah, except when he decided that he was a solid receiver, then he started writing those damn prophetic books which I have gone through two, three times, and I can’t make any poetry out of them whatsoever. I mean, I can make poetry every once in a while, see it happening. But when Blake really was sure that the angels were speaking to him, they stopped speaking.
Lu
The point is that words are not something which in themselves are anything but Lowghosts, instead of the Logos. Words are things which just happen to be in your head instead of someone else’s head, just like memories are, various other pieces of furniture in this room that this Martian has to put the clues in.
Q : Getting back to this idea of the creative insights being isolated from the medium. Are you saying that all poetry has to be written this way, or that some poetry is written this way, or what ?
JS : Well, I certainly don’t know. If you mean it as a recipe for baking a cake, obviously no. If you mean believing in all of this, obviously no. But it’s my firm conviction that all poetry, good poetry, is written this way, in spite of the poet.
You see, the Word, the Logos is – and this is impossible to read out loud, just like the whole personification thing is – the word is half the time with capital W, uppercase, and half the time with the lowercase w, you see. And so Lowghost then becomes Word. In other words, the words which are being used are simply a reflection of the Word, with the capital. And the pun doesn’t get as funny when you have him pinned to the cross, and the business of the shadow—which was written, incidentally, on Good Friday, for some obvious reason.
JS : You mean can we take credit for our poems ? Well, is a radio set a creator of the radio program ?
Q : No. Well, that’s what I mean.
JS : Yeah. But at the same time you don’t get the radio program if the radio set has static in it.
Q : Oh no, no. But the poet is an agent then, or…
JS : Well yeah, like a mother is, yeah. But you know, it’s pretty hard for a father to have a baby. I mean, good agents are kind of hard to find these days. I don’t really see that it’s anything less to be proud of to be a good agent.
Well, what I’m trying to say is if you have an idea that you want to develop, don’t write a poem about it because it’s almost bound to be a bad poem. You can have an idea that you want to develop, and the poem develops an idea which is a little bit different. Say, like Pope’s “Essay on Man” which was supposed to please Bolingbroke enormously and didn’t, and didn’t please Pope. I’m using just about the so-called most disciplined poet there.
I don’t think that anyone who’s a practicing poet, even a practicing bad poet, who’s done it for a long enough time, would disagree with the fact that there is something from the Outside. I mean, you get this in Longinus for christ’s sake, all of these pretty square people going all the way back. Saint Thomas Aquinas says it, and you can’t have anyone who’s farther away from poetry than him. But I do think that an awful lot of poets feel at the back of their minds that they would really rather express themselves. “This poem is me. I am this poem,” you know, and so forth.
Now, Creeley talks about poems following the dictation of language. It seems to me that’s nonsense. Language is part of the furniture in the room. Language isn’t anything of itself. It’s something which is in the mind of the host that the parasite (the poem) is invading.
But on the other hand, given a source of energy which you can direct, you can direct yourself out of the picture. Then given the cooperation between the host poet and the visitor—the thing from Outside—the more things you have in the room the better if you can handle them in such a way that you don’t impose your will on what is coming through.
But at the same time, you are stuck with language, and you arc stuck with words, and you are stuck with the things that you know. It’s a very nice thing, and a very difficult thing. The more you know, the more languages you know, the more building blocks the Martians have to play with. It’s harder, too, because an uneducated person often can write a better poem than an educated person, simply because there are only so many building blocks, so many ways of arranging them, and after that, you’re through. I mean, the thing behind you is through. And it can make for simplicity, as in good ballads, American and English. In the long run, it can make for really just good poetry. And sometimes for great poetry, an infinitely small vocabulary is what you want. Perhaps that would be the ideal, except for the fact that it’s pretty hard to write a poem that way.