• Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi 23 11 14

    That’s some­thing which is in all English depart­ment lec­tures now, but it was the first thing since Blake on the busi­ness of taking poe­try as coming from the out­side rather than from the inside. In other words, ins­tead of the poet being a beau­ti­ful machine which manu­fac­tu­red the cur­rent for itself, did eve­ry­thing for itself – almost a per­pe­tual motion machine of emo­tion until the poet’s heart broke or it was bur­ned on the beach like Shelley’s – ins­tead there was some­thing from the Outside coming in.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    You have to not real­ly want not what you don’t want to say.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    And here the ana­lo­gy of the medium comes in, which Yeats star­ted out, and which Cocteau in his Orphée, both the play and the pic­ture, used a car radio for, but which is essen­tial­ly the same thing. That essen­tial­ly you are some­thing which is being trans­mit­ted into, and the more that you clear your mind away from your­self, and the more also that you do some cen­so­ring – because there will be all sorts of things coming from your mind, from the depths of your mind, from things that you want, which will foul up the poem.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    And this is the kind of thing that you have to avoid. There are a great many things you can’t avoid. It’s impos­sible for the source of ener­gy to come to you in Martian or North Korean or Tamil or any lan­guage you don’t know. It’s impos­sible for the source of ener­gy to use images you don’t have, or at least don’t have some­thing of. It’s as if a Martian comes into a room with children’s blocks with A, B, C, D, E which are in English and he tries to convey a mes­sage. This is the way the source…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    But at the same time, you are stuck with lan­guage, and you arc stuck with words, and you are stuck with the things that you know. It’s a very nice thing, and a very dif­fi­cult thing. The more you know, the more lan­guages you know, the more buil­ding blocks the Martians have to play with. It’s har­der, too, because an une­du­ca­ted per­son often can write a bet­ter poem than an edu­ca­ted per­son, sim­ply because there are only so many buil­ding blocks, so many ways of arran­ging them, and after that, you’re through. I mean, the thing behind you is through.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    But on the other hand, given a source of ener­gy which you can direct, you can direct your­self out of the pic­ture. Then given the coope­ra­tion bet­ween the host poet and the visitor—the thing from Outside—the more things you have in the room the bet­ter if you can handle them in such a way that you don’t impose your will on what is coming through.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    Now, Creeley talks about poems fol­lo­wing the dic­ta­tion of lan­guage. It seems to me that’s non­sense. Language is part of the fur­ni­ture in the room. Language isn’t any­thing of itself. It’s some­thing which is in the mind of the host that the para­site (the poem) is invading.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    I don’t think that anyone who’s a prac­ti­cing poet, even a prac­ti­cing bad poet, who’s done it for a long enough time, would disa­gree with the fact that there is some­thing from the Outside. I mean, you get this in Longinus for christ’s sake, all of these pret­ty square people going all the way back. Saint Thomas Aquinas says it, and you can’t have anyone who’s far­ther away from poe­try than him. But I do think that an awful lot of poets feel at the back of their minds that they would real­ly rather express them­selves. “This poem is me.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    Well, what I’m trying to say is if you have an idea that you want to deve­lop, don’t write a poem about it because it’s almost bound to be a bad poem. You can have an idea that you want to deve­lop, and the poem deve­lops an idea which is a lit­tle bit dif­ferent. Say, like Pope’s “Essay on Man” which was sup­po­sed to please Bolingbroke enor­mous­ly and didn’t, and didn’t please Pope. I’m using just about the so-cal­led most dis­ci­pli­ned poet there.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    JS : You mean can we take cre­dit for our poems ? Well, is a radio set a crea­tor of the radio pro­gram ? Q : No. Well, that’s what I mean. JS : Yeah. But at the same time you don’t get the radio pro­gram if the radio set has sta­tic in it. Q : Oh no, no. But the poet is an agent then, or… JS : Well yeah, like a mother is, yeah. But you know, it’s pret­ty hard for a father to have a baby. I mean, good agents are kind of hard to find these days. I don’t real­ly see that it’s any­thing less…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    You see, the Word, the Logos is – and this is impos­sible to read out loud, just like the whole per­so­ni­fi­ca­tion thing is – the word is half the time with capi­tal W, upper­case, and half the time with the lower­case w, you see. And so Lowghost then becomes Word. In other words, the words which are being used are sim­ply a reflec­tion of the Word, with the capi­tal. And the pun doesn’t get as fun­ny when you have him pin­ned to the cross, and the busi­ness of the shadow—which was writ­ten, inci­den­tal­ly, on Good Friday, for some obvious reason.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    Q : Getting back to this idea of the crea­tive insights being iso­la­ted from the medium. Are you saying that all poe­try has to be writ­ten this way, or that some poe­try is writ­ten this way, or what ? JS : Well, I cer­tain­ly don’t know. If you mean it as a recipe for baking a cake, obvious­ly no. If you mean belie­ving in all of this, obvious­ly no. But it’s my firm convic­tion that all poe­try, good poe­try, is writ­ten this way, in spite of the poet.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    The point is that words are not some­thing which in them­selves are any­thing but Lowghosts, ins­tead of the Logos. Words are things which just hap­pen to be in your head ins­tead of someone else’s head, just like memo­ries are, various other pieces of fur­ni­ture in this room that this Martian has to put the clues in.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    Yeah, except when he deci­ded that he was a solid recei­ver, then he star­ted wri­ting those damn pro­phe­tic books which I have gone through two, three times, and I can’t make any poe­try out of them what­soe­ver. I mean, I can make poe­try eve­ry once in a while, see it hap­pe­ning. But when Blake real­ly was sure that the angels were spea­king to him, they stop­ped speaking.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    I mean, things that you ought to be sus­pi­cious of are things that you can use for your own per­so­nal inter­ests rather than any­thing else. I wouldn’t wor­ry about if some­thing appears. It’s like an epi­pha­ny. Well then, use the epi­pha­ny, but just rea­lize that there could be about twen­ty-seven other epi­pha­nies which would be just as good, if they’d happened.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    As far as the busi­ness of rea­ding – edu­ca­tion – I think that unfor­tu­na­te­ly the uni­ver­si­ties hin­der it rather than help it usual­ly because they make rea­ding and edu­ca­tion a chore rather than some­thing that you enjoy doing. But cer­tain­ly I think that any poet who is going to write decent poe­try in this modern age where we don’t have the bal­lad tra­di­tion any­more, where you could get by with prac­ti­cal­ly no fur­ni­ture, and let’s squat on the floor, ma’am, and that sort of thing – I do think that just the ave­rage young poet ought to read as many…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « Vancouver lec­tures » ⋅ The House That Jack Built : The Collected Lectures of Jack Spicer ⋅ éd. Peter Gizzi

    JS : I’m inter­es­ted in being a conveyor of mes­sages, whe­ther they’re the truth or not. There’s no rea­son to sup­pose that a mes­sage neces­sa­ri­ly because it’s conveyed from an out­side source to a poet is true. As far as not being inter­es­ted in lan­guage, it’s pro­ba­bly because I’m a pro­fes­sio­nal linguist.…

  • Jack Spicer ⋅ « First Letter to Robin Blaser » ⋅ Admonitions 16 11 19

    Dear Robin, Enclosed you find the first of the publi­ca­tions of White Rabbit Press. The second will be much hand­so­mer. You are right that I don’t now need your cri­ti­cisms of indi­vi­dual poems. But I still want them. It’s pro­ba­bly from old habit – but it’s an awful­ly old habit. Halfway through After Lorca I dis­co­ve­red that I was wri­ting a book ins­tead of a series of poems and indi­vi­dual cri­ti­cism by anyone sud­den­ly became less impor­tant. This is true of my Admonitions which I will send you when com­plete. (I have eight of them alrea­dy and there will probably…